The State of Television

The State of Television

Contributor: Eric Somers

Category: Opinion Pieces

Description: Eric Somers loves TV too much to tolerate bad or lazy writing, and each week he shines a light on a brilliant achiever or a blatant offender. Usually it’s the latter.

ericsomers

Convenience is No Excuse!

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • email
  • Print
iPhone

iPhone

Are you like me?

Do you think technology has come too far?

Do you think the so called “scientists” have gotten too big for their britches?

If so, skip ahead to the next paragraph. If not, please look in your pockets. More likely than not, you’ll find some evidence that I’m right (no, I’m not talking about your boner, I’m talking about your cell phone).

Sorry, AT&T and Verizon, but you’ve overreached. Nobody needs a TV on their phone.

Now, don’t mistake me for a fuddy duddy. I hate purists as much as the next guy. Back when cinephiles were screaming at Ted Turner for colorizing Gone with the Wind, I just smiled. I couldn’t understand the outrage (over a “supposed” violation of the director’s vision) when the stilted dialogue of the movie was much more off putting than anything Ted Turner could do to the graphics.

But I digress. I’m not here to bash the most dated, overrated, and unwatchable film in the history of the medium. I’m here to defend its defenders. I’m here to declare that format does indeed need to be protected.

I’m here to say that it’s wrong to watch television on a two inch screen! It’s simply not fair to the TV shows. Sure, watching Jay Leno is acceptable (because a two inch screen is perfect for making his chin look normal) but he’s the exception to the rule.

In fact, now that I think about it, I don’t even want to watch a normal chinned Leno on a two inch screen (just like I wouldn’t want to watch Letterman on a screen that fills in the gap between his teeth).

And if I can’t figure out what the hell’s going on on Lost while I’m watching it on a 32” screen, what chance am I going to have if I’m watching it on my cell phone?

And what about shows that go out of their way to give me majestic scenery? They may as well be filming Survivor on Gilligan’s Island if I’m watching it on my cell phone.

And what about those poor sons of bitches who try to watch The Wizard of Oz or Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory on a cell phone? The Munchkins and Oompa Loompas would practically disappear!

“Who’s Willy talking to? Is Dorothy nuts? How come my TV keeps ringing? Oh, right, hello? Hey Dave, thanks for calling. What was I doing? Nothing much, just watching The Wizard of Oz. Speaking of which, do you know why they’re following a yellow line in the dirt or why Dorothy brought her hamster, Toto, with her?”

I believe that if you can’t be troubled enough to find a screen that’s bigger than a bread box, you don’t deserve to watch television.

I remember the good old days before we had cell phones, back when technology was my answering machine. I remember the excitement of getting home at the end of the night and checking to see who called. And I remember the crippling depression that set in when I had no messages!

Now, thanks to technology, I’m getting that depression 15 times a day, every time I log on to my empty email account. Thanks, technology!

You know what else I hate? Reality dating shows. I mean, I get it that people need to put on an act in order make their lives interesting enough for TV, but when phoniness is delivered with all that fake sincerity, like when Brett Michaels or Ray J acts hurt when one of their skanks appears to be in it for something besides their love, I just find that soooo depressing. It sort of diminishes the whole idea of people genuinely caring about anything. I wish God would be merciful and make Ray J and Brett Michaels fall in love with each other.

So, in conclusion, cell phone televisions suck, I am not popular (on the phone or on the email), and Ray J and Brett Michaels need to tenderly smash each other with their respective rosy thorns.

Have a great week, Heavy Hitters. Have a super duper pooper scooper week!

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • email
  • Print

6 Comments to “Convenience is No Excuse!”


  • Jason Comment from Jason LaCour

    “boner”

  • Todd Comment from SantaAnitaKid

    Ted Turner colorized what?

    Gone with the Wind was shot in technicolor. It won an Academy Award for Best Cinematography, Color.

    That’s okay…you made up for the gaffe with “How come my TV keeps ringing?” Very funny. I laughed out loud.

    Keep up the good work!

    SAK

    “I do have a test today, that wasn’t bullshit. It’s on European socialism. I mean, really, what’s the point? I’m not European. I don’t plan on being European. So who gives a crap if they’re socialists? They could be fascist anarchists, it still doesn’t change the fact that I don’t own a car.” John Hughes

  • ericsomers Comment from Eric Somers

    Hey Santa Anita Kid,

    Film colorization[1] is any process that adds color to black and white, sepia or monochrome moving-picture images. It may be done as a special effect, or to modernize black and white films, or to restore color films.

    RESTORE color!

  • Todd Comment from SantaAnitaKid

    “Frank!” “Drebin…” “You’re both right.”

    That is, of course, unless you’re Eric Somers. Then you are wrong — very, very, wrong. Gone with the Wind was NOT filmed in black and white (and then colorized).

  • Todd Comment from SantaAnitaKid

    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0031381/

    “Gone With the Wind was shot entirely in gorgeous Technicolor…”

    http://www.museum.tv/eotvsection.php?entrycode=colorization

    “…the viewer might erroneously conclude that a color film such as Gone with the Wind was originally shot in monochrome and later colorized.”

    http://www.squidoo.com/gonewiththewindmovie

    “First color film to win the Best Picture Oscar.”

    “All seven of Hollywood’s then-existing Technicolor cameras were used to film the Burning of the Atlanta Depot….”

    “Of all the many actresses who tested for the part of Scarlett, only Paulette Goddard and Vivien Leigh were filmed in color.”

  • Todd Comment from SantaAnitaKid

    Hold the phone….just when I thought I was, oh so, smart — it turns out I’m a bit of a dumb-ass!

    “Back when cinephiles were screaming at Ted Turner for colorizing Gone with the Wind…” — E. Somers

    http://tech.mit.edu/V109/N7/wind.07a.html

    Over the years, the stunning print of Gone With the Wind lost the vibrance of its vivid colors due to the frailty and instability of the film stocks. Since his Turner Broadcasting System (TBS) had acquired ownership of the print in 1986 when it bought the MGM library, Ted Turner decided to restore the film by returning to the original nitrate negatives. Roger Mayer (originally from MGM) and Dick May headed up the $250,000 project to create a new, stabler negative of the film from the original three.
    The restored print of Gone With the Wind is disappointingly inconsistent in the quality of color. One shot would be breathtakingly beautiful only to be followed by another shot whose colors would be washed away…”


Leave a Comment

Follow comments via RSS 2.0 feed. Create a trackback from your own site.

Three Perfect Sitcoms

Doug Stanhope Crosses the Line

Louis C. K. is a Jerk

Do You Stink as a Comic?

The Kilborn File